Posts Tagged ‘online advertising’

What Facebook’s Open Graph Means to Marketers

Wednesday, April 28th, 2010

Facebook introduced Open Graph at the F8 Conference last week, which will extend Facebook’s platform to any third-party publisher online. So, what does this mean for marketers? 

For the Publishing Marketer, this will allow you to tap into Facebook’s 500+ million users without having to have a Facebook branded Fan Page. By using the Facebook API, will allow publishers to enhance the user’s experience at their site with social functionality.  How?  Publisher’s will now be able to place the Facebook toolbar at the bottom of a site page, which will offer a social experience with the popular ’Like’ button, friend’s list info and chat.

Marketers that advertise their products/services or Fan Pages on Facebook  will eventually have better ad targeting, since the Open Graph will allow for Facebook to gather new user data on preferences and behaviors, thus making better for targeted ads for marketers.

Being Efficient in a Bad Economy

Tuesday, March 10th, 2009

It’s tough times out there, including for the online industry, so how do we make sure that we are getting the most for our advertising buck? Take a look at your current online marketing strategy and see which channels are the most inefficient.  Get rid of them!  Yes, I know what you must be thinking, if it’s bringing me even one client, it’s worth it…but it’s not.  Now is the time to really pay attention to your customer acquisition metrics and conversions and see where you can cut the fat, so you can move over money to the most efficient channels.

Also, pay more attention to your customer retention programs.  This is where many marketers don’t take advantage of the database they already have.  Make email and viral marketing your best friend.  Offer promotions to drive the traffic back to your site.  I will guarantee you, by creating unique retention programs, you will increase the LTV (Lifetime Value) of your customer and increase your ROI.  This will also help you to decrease your marketing expenses, since its much cheaper to market to current clients than it is to acquire new ones.

Angstz.com – New Social Networking Advice Site

Wednesday, September 3rd, 2008

Angstz.com is a new social networking advice site for ages 18 and up.  What makes Angstz.com unique in the social networking space is its ability to target its membership with brand advertising.  Angstz.com allows advertisers to run advertising targeted by Member Profile interests.  The interests are divided by Advice Channels, which include Travel, Fitness, Gaming, Relationships, Business, Colleges, Jobs, Politics, Religion, and many others.

Angstz.com has found a way to target its users that Facebook.com, and MySpace.com have not been able to do with their own membership base, target based on interests.

Advertisers have a choice of either traditional banner advertisements or branding the entire Advice channels at AngstZ. Angstz.com is currently in public beta and advertisers can get reduce pricing, while the site is in beta.

Go to http://angstz.com.

How the Economy affects your Online Marketing Stategy

Tuesday, July 1st, 2008

Online marketing has been a cheap and effective solution comparatively to traditional media for advertisers with small budgets. The baseline for online marketing choices for advertisers have been search marketing through Google and Yahoo, display advertising through Advertising.com, and affiliate marketing through LinkShare and Commission Junction. Now, these cheap solutions are being affected by the economy, due to advertisers of all sizes looking for economical ways to maximize their ROIs because of softer sales, which causes high biddng wars in Search and increases in CPM and CPA costs for prime display advertising space.

As the U.S.  economy worsens, big budget advertisers that have used multi-channels for their marketing strategies will be forced to cut their budgets and limit their marketing channels, which makes online marketing a more attractive solution to traditional outlets. So, what can you do as a Marketer with a limited budget competing with the Big Boys?  Try alternative advertising services to the baselines.  For example, advertising networks, such as AdOnNetwork represent some of the Top ComScore sites and offer cheap remnant ad spaces for a 1/3 of the price.

Yahoo – Google Deal, what does it mean for your Search strategy?

Wednesday, June 18th, 2008

Now that the Yahoo – Google deal has been done, how does this affect your Search strategy? Is it better or worse? For Yahoo it’s good, for you as the advertiser, it limits your choices on pricing for Search, which is bad.

Now, that Google will be serving their search ads on Yahoo, that limits the amount of advertising choices, which ultimately means that Search pricing for your keywords are going to go up. Also, the advertiser will have to deal with higher online search budgets, since it won’t be offset, by running ads on Yahoo and Google separately. Traditionally Yahoo’s keyword search term pricing has been lower than Google’s, so now that Google will be running the show, there will be no choices to separate the Search campaigns in other platforms for reducing pricing. So, what about MSN?

MSN’s search has been no match for Yahoo or Google in the past, but maybe with this new partnership deal, will step up MSN’s effort to be a real player in Search and as an alternative for online advertisers. We will have to wait and see.

Horizontal or Vertical Ad Networks – Should I bother?

Friday, May 30th, 2008

There’s a lot of hype over ad networks recently, due to the explosion of the online advertising business growth.  There are now over 300 ad networks online, so how do you choose as an advertiser, which one to go with?

When Ad Networks first began, most networks were built to become a one stop shopping source for advertisers.  These ad networks would fight to get the top 100 trafficked sites that were listed on ComScore to join their networks.   These networks are called Horizontal Ad Networks;  an example of a Horizontal Ad Network is Advertising.com. These networks are good if an advertiser needs to market broadly online and is more concerned with a brand marketing campaign, rather than a direct marketing campaign.

As advertisers started needing more niche advertising solutions to reach specific narrow target markets, Vertical Ad Networks started to appear. These networks are much more recent to the online marketing industry, than the Horizontal Networks, but work just as effective as a one stop solution for advertisers.  Vertical Ad Networks, such as ESPN.com or Adify.com are a much better choice for an advertiser that needs to reach a specific audience.

When choosing an ad network, choose the one that is best for reaching your audience.  If you have a broad campaign consider Horizontal Networks, if you have a specific niche market that you must reach, consider a Vertical Ad Network.

To brand advertise on Facebook or not, that is the question

Tuesday, May 6th, 2008

I recently had a website owner ask me about advertising on Facebook, whether the campaign that they were running should continue. They had done some minimal testing at Facebook themselves and received a lot of impressions, but very little clicks. They thought that they should continue, since they were exposing their brand name to the members of Facebook, so it was worth it to them to let people know who they were, especially since they weren’t paying for it, since it was a CPC campaign. My simple question to them was, “What is your advertising goal?” They replied, “…to get traffic.” Well, then my answer is, stop advertising with Facebook because it is not going to help you get traffic, if you’re not getting any or low clicks. You would think that marketers would know this, but don’t assume.

Many marketers believe by running ads with no click-through helps with exposing the brand name. Be careful of those marketers because they are not looking out for your best interests. Your goal is to get traffic to your site. Remember that.

People don’t run ads on Google to only expose their brands, they want traffic to their sites, so work on the premise with any high-trafficked site…don’t just run ads on Facebook with the expectations that by exposing your brand that people are paying attention. If people are paying attention, then they will click on your ads, which will help with your brand marketing efforts. Yes, it is true, that you will receive free advertising on Facebook, but is it worth it, if no one is coming to your site? No, so why do it?

Think about your goals. If you are a web owner and want traffic to your site, go to where you will find the best click-through with the best conversions at your site. By running ads with no click-through is a waste of money and time. It does not brand your company to have no one clicking on your ads. Clicks mean that Internet users are interested in what you are offering and by the interest, helps establishes your brand.

Google is Darth Vader. So, where is Luke?

Monday, May 5th, 2008

 

Once upon a time, a long time ago, Google offered an advertising service to all types of advertisers that could advertise cheaply and effectively to reach their target markets. Advertisers could spend less than $100 per day and find quality traffic reaching their sites.

Well, as I mentioned, that was a long time ago. Now, the “Little Advertiser”, the guy that I consider to have advertising budgets that are below $5,000 per month, are having a hard time competing with advertisers with larger advertising budgets, due to Google’s attempts to “bring better quality traffic by raising the minimum cpcs to as high as $1, $5, $15, and $20 per click.” Well, how does that bring better quality traffic you ask?

The idea is, if an advertiser really values a specific keyword, they will pay anything for that keyword and thus drive out advertisers that are not willing or “can afford” that premium keyword, which gives the advertiser who bought the keyword an advantage to getting better traffic and better placement in Sponsored Advertising positions. But, the advertiser that has most likely bought this keyword has to have a larger budget than everyone else, which discourages the Little Advertiser from bidding on the keyword, thus knocking them out of the bid and creating a service that is meant only for advertisers with big budgets.

Google has forgotten that their ‘idea’ does not work for a new advertiser with a low or tight budget, since the new advertiser hasn’t had a chance to test and optimize their keywords to know which works best for them in driving quality traffic. For example, If I only have a starting budget of $500 and the cpc for my keyword is $10, then I will only get 50 clicks to my site and as you will learn, not all clicks reach our homepages and only a small percentage will convert, before being optimized correctly, hopefully. 50 clicks is not enough data to figure out which keywords worked the best. The Little Advertiser will not last long in spending money with Google or not even attempt to spend money at all, due to the high costs and little return. In essence, the Google that had created the fair, “ever good” online ad service for everyone that had created them, no longer exists. Google in its attempts to bring more money to itself, which let’s admit we are Americans so there is nothing wrong about that, but has destroyed what was so great about them…the democratization of buying online ad media.

So, what happened to that not evil Google that we all loved? They joined the dark forces of the high-price spending advertising world in order to get their marketing capitalization up. Let’s face it, the days of cheap advertising on Google is over and the ever good Google has become Darth Vader.

So, is there a Luke Skywalker out there that will save the Little Advertiser? I think so, like everything else in the Internet world, you just have to wait for the next ‘big thing’ and I believe it will be a new advertising network that will be cost-effective and driving quality traffic for an affordable price…and hopefully, without the click fraud. So hey Luke Skywalker, hurry up and launch!